R and I have both been passionate followers of the Primaries, R more so than me. Since we are a house divided on the issue, though we both support the Democrats this election, we have many long and heated 'conversations' on the subject. We have both agreed to disagree without trying to convert the other to our cause. I have been supporting Senator Clinton till now, while R is a staunch Barack loyalist. I would like to make this clear that I do not oppose Senator Obama, I think it is the policy grounding that I got in my planning degree which makes me support Hillary who as is evident in her speeches and debates, is an unashamed policy wonk, though of course the idea of the first female US President is in itself tremendously exciting. I do of course believe that she is thoroughly qualified to be the President. When we heard that Barack Obama would be conducting a townhall in Austin on the 28th of February, we both jumped at the chance to attend.
The townhall was supposed to start at 9.30 am at the Austin Convention Center. R, I and our friend A, in our enthusiasm got there at 7.15 to discover a long line outside. People had started lining up at 5 am! Well. Austinites are definitely passionate about their politics! The doors opened at 7.30 and we were able to get excellent seats in the third row, about 15 feet away from the podium. By 9.30 the place had pretty much filled up and one could feel the excitement in the air as everyone waited for Barack Obama to show up. He showed up around 9.50 to the loud chanting of Yes We Can! There is no denying that he is an extremely charismatic and gifted orator, with excellent control of the audience who were hanging on to his every word. The 15 minute speech felt a little jaded though, but the blame is probably on this media driven age where we have heard and read the speech many times over. I had two questions, one was about his plans to invest in green energy and the other to invest in funding research at Universities. Both got answered along with other questions and I must say that though of course there was not enough time to answer it in as much detail as I would have liked, he did have polices I would agree with. In all, he was able to take only six questions on subjects ranging from 'No Child Left Behind' , the US Patent Office, fiscal responsibility for the government, foreign aid to Africa to creating jobs for the next generation. I personally thought the highlight of the debate was the fact that he seems to be keen about fiscal responsibility, even though liberal Democrats are often accused of being big spenders. The 'cute' moment of the meeting came at the end, when he took a question from a 9 year old who actually had two questions, the first one being if he would sign her book.
I liked the fact that he doesn't offer a panacea to everything and doesn't promise that the government would solve everyones' difficulties. He emphasized that although the government could put helpful policies in place and help people along the way, it is up to people to be proactive and take charge of their lives. I thought that this attitude overall makes him a compelling choice for the Democrat nominee. Of course I am still not a total convert till I give Hillary a chance!
